Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Ray @ Mukesh Kumar Ray v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38318 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-339 Year-2022 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali ====================================================== MUKESH KUMAR @ MUKESH RAY @ MUKESH KUMAR RAY Son of Lakshman Ray Resident of village - Mahua singh Ray, P.S.- Mahua, DistrictVaishali ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ravish Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Md. Matloob Rab, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of two cases and allegation is of recovery of 1134 liter of liquor from a pickup van. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not apprehended from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession, petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of the alleged vehicle and his
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38318 of 2022(2) dt.24-08-2022 2/2 name transpired based on secret information which is the easiest way to implicate a person in order to save the real culprits. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 339 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T