← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/722/2021disposed

Ranjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-01-24Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.722 of 2021 ====================================================== 1.

Ranjeet Kumar son of Late Vindeshwar Paswan Resident of VillageLakhawar, P.O.- Lakhawar, P.S.- Ghosi, District- Jehanabad, Pin Code804434. 2.

Chandrama Kumar son of Late Vindeshwar Paswan Resident of VillageLakhawar, P.O.- Lakhawar, P.S.- Ghosi, District- Jehanabad, Pin Code804434. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate cum Collector, Bhojpur (Ara).

2.

The District Magistrate cum Collector, Jehanabad, District- Jehanabad. 3.

The District Magistrate cum Collector, Arwal, District- Arwal. 4.

The Joint Secretary cum In- Charge Comprehensive Finance Management System (In short C.F.M.S.) Govt. of Bihar, Finance Department, Old Secretariate, Patna.

5.

The Director, Directorate General Provident Fund, Pant Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

6.

The District Provident Fund Officer, Jehanabad, District- Jehanabad. 7.

The Treasury Officer, Jehanabad, District- Jehanabad. 8.

The Circle Officer, Sandesh, District- Bhojpur (Ara). 9.

The Circle Officer, Jehanabad. District- Jehanabad. 10.

The Circle Officer, Makhdumpur, District- Jehanabad. 11.

The Circle Officer, Kako, District- Jehanabad. 12.

The Circle Officer, Karpi, District- Jehanabad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ghanshyam Sharma,Advo For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Anuradha Singh, SC-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 24-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

Learned counsel for the State submits counter affidavit in which, it has been mentioned about payment of admissible arrear of utilized earned leave, admissible payment

of ACP benefits, about the payment of benefits which are paid in the account of petitioner no. 2. It has been submitted that for the payment of GPF amount, they are in co-ordination of the different offices, where the petitioner's father served and it has been requested that for payment further time is required. Counsel for the respondent submits that the chart relating to paid amount has also annexed. He seeks four weeks time in which the GPF amount may be paid. In the present facts and circumstances that the effort towards payment of other amounts have been made and towards payment of GPF amount, the matters are in process. Let the respondents are directed to complete the entire process within ten weeks and assure the payment in the account of the petitioner along with admissible statutory interest, within said period.

In this view of the matter, the present application is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner that in case he found any amount not properly calculated, he shall file representation before the authority within ten weeks thereafter. With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition stands disposed of.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) N.K/- U