Subash Rajbhar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47179 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-68 Year-2021 Thana- DURAULI District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.

SUBASH RAJBHAR Son of Baijnath Rajbhar Resident of Village - Karanpura, Police Station - Darauli, District - Siwan. 2.

Deepak Rajbhar @ Deepak Kumar Bhar Son of Subash Rajbhar Resident of Village - Karanpura, Police Station - Darauli, District - Siwan. 3.

Vishnu Rajbhar @ Vishnu Kumar Bhar Son of Achhayvar Rajbhar Resident of Village - Karanpura, Police Station - Darauli, District - Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 23-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 448, 34, 323, 324, 325, 307, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioners is of indiscriminately assaulting the informant's side.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47179 of 2021(3) dt.23-06-2022 2/2 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation leveled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. It is submitted that for the alleged occurrence, there is a case and counter-case between the parties and both sides have sustained injuries. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail by submitting that it has come in the impugned order, that some of the injury sustained by the informant's side is grievous in nature.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners named above on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioners is hereby rejected.

The instant bail application is dismissed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T