Basant Bind v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37691 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2024 Thana- HALSI District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Basant Bind S/o Rajendra Bind R/o Village- Kakrauri, P.S.- Halsi, DistrictLakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manohar Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shyameshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-06-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 379 and 325 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and the informant alleges that he was intercepted by the accused persons and petitioner assaulted him by an iron rod over his right arm causing fracture, thereafter, Murari Bind assaulted him by an iron rod on left arm causing fracture, further, Amarjeet assaulted him by an iron rod over leg and waist causing fracture and thereafter all the accused persons also assaulted by various means and Mithun snatched

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37691 of 2025(2) dt.18-06-2025 2/3 mobile phone of the informant while Praveen snatched Rs. 11,000/- from Amarjeet Kumar.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R., it would manifest that petitioner is alleged to have assaulted the informant by an iron rod causing fracture of his right arm, but then from perusal of Annexure-2 to the anticipatory bail application i.e. the injury report, it would manifest that the same records the injury on right hand as pain with swelling, it is thus submitted that it absolutely does not stand to reason that on what basis the said injury has been opined to be grievous when the right hand of the informant was not fractured on account of assault and only pain and swelling was found.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37691 of 2025(2) dt.18-06-2025 3/3 (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Halsi P.S. Case No. 12 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T