Dibyanshu Kumar @ Anshu @ Dibyanshu Kumar Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46509 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-272 Year-2020 Thana- RANIYATALAB District- Patna ====================================================== DIBYANSHU KUMAR @ ANSHU @ DIBYANSHU KUMAR SHARMA Son of Krishnadhar Sharma Resident of Kaab Mahadeo Sthan, P.S.- Ranitalab, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Samrendra Kumar Jha, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-03-2022 Heard the parties.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the Pairvikar of the case has not given correct information with respect to the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and as such incorrect statement has been made in Para-3 of the bail petition. However, learned counsel for the petitioner, on his personal endeavour, has been able to bring on record that the petitioner has been made accused in one other case, as stated in paragraph No.3 of the supplementary affidavit, and in such circumstances, he seeks permission to withdraw the application filed on behalf of petitioner.

Law is well settled with regard to false averments in the pleading are sufficient to attract Chapter XI of the I.P.C. In

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46509 of 2021(3) dt.21-03-2022 2/2 this case Pairvikar of the petitioner has filed the present bail application containing false averment in paragraph No.3. This practice of having made a false statement incorporated in an affidavit filed before Court should always be deprecated and entail appropriate legal action against the accused persons. However, it appears that the Pairvikar after getting knowledge of the other case has filed supplementary affidavit, prima facie it appears to this Court that incorrect statement made in paragraph No.3 has not been made deliberately.

In view of the above submission, the application filed on behalf of the petitioner is dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner, if so advised, may file fresh application without suppressing any fact on affidavit. The petitioner may utilize the certified copy of the impugned order etc. to avoid any further delay. If such application is filed, the office is directed to place the present case along with fresh bail application.

(Purnendu Singh, J) mantreshwar/- U T