Dara @ Sunil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39996 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-54 Year-2016 Thana- BIKRAM District- Patna ====================================================== Dara @ Sunil Kumar aged about 37 years (male) Son of Sri Chandeshwar Singh Resident of Village- Dilavarpur, P.S.- Bihta, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jawed Ahmad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Bikram P.S. Case No. 54 of 2016 registered for the offence under Section 392/411 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of petitioner has come on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Niranjan Kumar. It is further submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as nature of accusation, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bailbond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39996 of 2019(5) dt.25-02-2020 2/2 amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur (Patna) in connection with Bikram P.S. Case No. 54 of 2016 on the following conditions: "(1) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present, as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail-bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail."

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J.) anay U T