← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./37231/2022allowed

Hari Nandan Ray v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-03Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37231 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-199 Year-2021 Thana- RAJEPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Hari Nandan Ray Son Of Late Dharkhan Ray R/O Village- Narhan, P.S.- Rajepur, Distt.- East Champaran 2.

Jhalsi Devi Wife Of Hari Nandan Ray R/O Village- Narhan, P.S.- Rajepur, Distt.- East Champaran 3.

Jay Chandra Ray Son Of Hari Nandan Ray R/O Village- Narhan, P.S.- Rajepur, Distt.- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abhishek Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 03-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304(B), 201, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioners are said to have committed murder of the daughter of the informant due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry and disappeared her dead body.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the petitioner nos. 1 and 2 are fatherin-law and mother-in-law of the deceased and petitioner no. 3 is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37231 of 2022(3) dt.03-11-2022 2/2 the brother of the husband of the deceased. He submits that the husband of the deceased is already in judicial custody. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that husband of the deceased is already in judicial custody, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Rajepur P.S. Case No. 199 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T