Patna High CourtCR. MISC./37695/2022dismissed

Md. Saddam @ Saddam v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-22Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37695 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-165 Year-2019 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Araria ====================================================== MD. SADDAM @ SADDAM S/O ALIM Resident of village- Methra, P.S.- Jokihat, District- Araria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nafisuzzoha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs.Sangeeta Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 22-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects within four weeks.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 376/34 of IPC and section 4 of D.P. Act.

Allegedly, the petitioner made relationship with the informant on the pretext of marrying her.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and have committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37695 of 2022(2) dt.22-11-2022 2/2 omnibus in nature. There is a delay of more than one month in the filing of FIR. He further submits that the victim girl is major aged about 21 years having love affairs one sided with the petitioner and forced him to marry with the but the petitioner and his family members denied to do so. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail by submitting that the victim in her statement recorded u/s 164 Cr.P.C. has supported the prosecution case. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner named above on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner is rejected.

This instant application is dismissed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T