← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./37588/2023bail rejected

Manjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-06-21Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37588 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-75 Year-2020 Thana- GHORASAHAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== MANJEET KUMAR SON OF AMBIKA PRASAD @ AMBIKA PRASAD KUSHWAHA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SHRIPUR KASWA, PSGHORASAHAN, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 21-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

This is the third attempt of the petitioner to seek bail in connection with Ghorasahan P.S. Case No. 75 of 2020 registered for the offences under Sections 302, 201, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 27 of the Arms Act.

The Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail as the trial has progressed.

The learned counsel for the petitioner, at this stage, submits that altogether there are 20 prosecution witnesses out of which only four witnesses have been examined and the last witness was examined on 12.04.2022 and thereafter not a single

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37588 of 2023(2) dt.21-06-2023 2/2 witness has turned up till date.

The learned Trial Court is directed to ensure that the trial progresses and is completed within a period of one year from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. In the event, if the trial is not concluded within the period aforesaid, the petitioner would be at liberty to file an application seeking regular bail before the learned Trial Court itself.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T