← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36014/2025bail granted

Dhanveer Yadav @ Dharamveer Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-28Justice Smt. Soni Shrivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36014 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2025 Thana- BASOPATTI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Dhanveer Yadav @ Dharamveer Yadav S/o Late Sulochan Yadav R/o VillageEast Basopatti, P.S.- Basopatti, Distt- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ratnakar Jha, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Damodar Prasad Tiwary,APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 28-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner makes a prayer for grant of regular bail in a registered for the offences punishable under Sections 274,275,327(5), 3(5) of the BNSS and section 30(a)of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.

3. The FIR and seizure list would go to show that total 180 liters of Nepali country made liquor was recovered from two motorcycles and one co-accused Sachin Kumar was arrested on the spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the name of the petitioner has surfaced in this case on the basis of disclosure made by the co-accused Sachin Kumar, who was apprehended on the spot. The petitioner was not arrested on the spot and as such, there is no recovery from the physical and conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36014 of 2025(2) dt.28-05-2025 2/2 relation either with the seized motorcycle or with the seized liquor and there is no independent witness to the seizure list. The petitioner is in custody since 01.05.2025.

5. The learned APP opposes the prayer for bail on the ground that the petitioner has four cases of similar nature, out of which petitioner is on bail in two of the cases.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/ successor court in Basopatti P.S. Case No. 79 of 2025.

7. However, the petitioner would co-operate in the investigation/ trial and in case he is released from custody, he would appear before the investigating officer of the concerned police station every week till the charge sheet is submitted. Further, the petitioner would co-operate in the trial by appearing on each and every date before the learned court concerned till the charges are framed.

(Soni Shrivastava, J) N.K/- U T