Ramshram Priyavatsalam v. The Union Of India Through The General Manager East Central Railways Hajipur Namely A. K. Mital And

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.703 of 2016 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 11943 of 2015 =========================================================== Ramshram Priyavatsalam Son of late Professor Babu Lal Roy, Resident of Nandlal Tola, Nehru Chowk, P.O. and P.S. - Chapra, District - Saran at Chapra. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The Union of India through the General Manager, East Central Railways Hajipur namely, Mr. A. K. Mital.

2. The General Manager, East Central Railways, Hajipur, namely Mr. A.K. Mital.

3. The Divisional Railways Manager (Engineering), East Central Railways, Sonepur, namely Mr. Manoj Kumar Agrawal.

4. The Divisional Engineering, East Central Railways, Sonepur, namely Mr. Sushil Kumar.

5. The Senior Divisional Engineer (Line), East Central Railways, Sonepur, namely Mr. Jabed Akhtar.

6. Senior Section Engineer (Works) East Central Railways, Hajipur, namely Mr. Satish Chandra Tiwari.

.... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner : Mr. Krishna Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. D.K.Sinha, Sr. Advocate Mr. Bijoy Kumar Sinha, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 14-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite parties.

2. The present petition has been filed for initiating a contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for willful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 22.09.2015 passed in CWJC No. 11943 of 2015 requiring the authorities to consider the petitioner's case and taking decision at their end.

3. A supplementary show cause has been filed on behalf of

Patna High Court MJC No.703 of 2016 dt.14-09-2016 opposite party no. 4 Annexure-B whereof being letter No. W/362/Hexagonal/SEE-Cl/W-3/1378 dated 26/27.07.2016 discloses that a final decision has been taken by the authorities and thus it is submitted that the order of this Court stands complied with.

4. In the above view of the matter, MJC No. 703 of 2016 stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner that in case he is aggrieved by the order of the authorities as noticed above, he may agitate the same before an appropriate forum in accordance with law, if so advised. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 21.09.2016 Transmission Date N.A.