Vikas Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37981 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-129 Year-2021 Thana- DAWATH District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Vikas Kumar Son Of Vinod Singh Resident Of Village - Khairahi, P.S. - Dawath, Distt. - Rohtas At Sasaram 2.

Aman Kumar Son Of Vinod Singh Resident Of Village - Khairahi, P.S. - Dawath, Distt. - Rohtas At Sasaram 3.

Dhananjay Singh Son Of Ram Kripal Singh Resident Of Village - Khairahi, P.S. - Dawath, Distt. - Rohtas At Sasaram 4.

Kanchan Devi Wife Of Dhananjay Singh Resident Of Village - Khairahi, P.S. - Dawath, Distt. - Rohtas At Sasaram ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raghunandan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 01-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 325, 307, 302, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Petitioners along with other accused persons are said to have assaulted the informant and his family member by means of iron pipe, iron rod, hammer and lathi.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37981 of 2023(2) dt.01-08-2023 2/2 this case due to land dispute. He submits that occurrence took place on 04.09.2020 but the FIR has been lodged on 25.08.2021 after delay of 11 months without explaining any reasonable cause of delay. He submits that the petitioner and informant both are own family members. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is delay in lodging the FIR, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Dawath P.S. Case No. 129 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

devendra/- (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) U T