Patna High CourtCR. REV./1013/2015dismissed

Ashok Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2016-11-22Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Revision No.1013 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -null Year- null Thana -null District- AURANGABAD ===========================================================

1. Ashok Yadav son of Doman Yadav resident of village- Kanchanbag, P.s.- Hussainganj, District- Palamu (under the guardianship of his father namely Doman Yadav) .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar No. 1, APP =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH JUDGMENT AND ORDER ORAL Date: 22-11-2016 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The present criminal revision application has been filed under Section 53 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000, against the order, dated 20.07.2015, passed, by learned Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, in Criminal Appeal No. 46 of 2015, which arises out of Amba Police Station Case No. 06 of 2014, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 504/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The learned Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, by the impugned order, has upheld the order, passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Aurangabad, dated 22.096.2015, whereby the

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.1013 of 2015 dt.22-11-2016 2/2 petitioner's application for regular bail has been rejected. The petitioner has been declared a juvenile.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has remained in custody in connection with the said Amba Police Station Case No. 06 of 2014 for more than 21⁄2 years.

5. On perusal of the impugned order, I find that the petitioner is involved in as many as 5 (five) cases, which are of serious nature involving offences punishable under Section 392/395 and other sections of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that aspect of the matter, the learned Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, has rejected the petitioner's application for bail by the impugned order.

6. Considering the above, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order, dated 20.07.2015, passed, by the learned Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, in Criminal Appeal No. 46 of 2015.

This revisional application is accordingly dismissed.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.) Prabhakar Anand/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 23.11.2016 Transmission Date 23.11.2016