Vijay Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47462 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-995 Year-2018 Thana- ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictRohtas ====================================================== 1.

VIJAY SAH S/o Sheo Pujan Sah Resident of Village Kudiyari P.S. Kareghar, District - Rohtas at Sasaram.

2.

Sanjay Sah S/o Sheo Pujan Sah Resident of Village Kudiyari P.S. Kareghar, District - Rohtas at Sasaram.

3.

Navrangi Devi W/o Sheo Pujan Sah Resident of Village Kudiyari P.S. Kareghar, District - Rohtas at Sasaram.

4.

Sheo Pujan Sah S/O Late Harwansh Sah Resident of Village Kudiyari P.S. Kareghar, District - Rohtas at Sasaram.

5.

Babita Devi S/O Vijay Sah Resident of Village Kudiyari P.S. Kareghar, District - Rohtas at Sasaram.

6.

Janki Devi S/O Sanjay Sah Resident of Village Kudiyari P.S. Kareghar, District - Rohtas at Sasaram.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Savita Devi W/O Manoj Kumar Resident of Village Kudiyari P.S. Karghar, District - Rohtas ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 23-03-2022 Heard leaned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 323, 341 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is a case of assault and theft of golden items of the complainant by the accused persons.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47462 of 2021(2) dt.23-03-2022 2/2 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that petitioners have not been apprehended at the spot. He further submits that no recovery from the conscious or constructive possession of the petitioners. Petitioners have got clean antecedent.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Sasaram at Rohtas in connection with Complaint Case No. 995 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U