← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/11971/2018disposed

Rajdeo Paswan v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-01-28Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11971 of 2018 ====================================================== Rajdeo Paswan S/o Late Krishnadeo Paswan, At Rashulpur Ahiyapur, P.S.- Ahiyapur, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Transport Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, Vishweshwraya Bhawan Bailey Road, Patna.

2. Regional Transport Authority Muzaffarpur, At Commissioner's Compound Muzaffarpur.

3. Chairman, Regional Transport Authority, Muzaffarpur.

4. Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Muzaffarpur, At Commissioner's Compound Muzaffarpur.

5. Deputy Secretary, Transport Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. at -Vishweshwraya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.P.K. Sahi, Sr. Advocate Mr.Sheopujan Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mrs.Ratna Kumari, AC to PAAG-2 For the Respondents :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate Mr.Randhir Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr.Ajay Kumar Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 28-01-2019 After some argument Mr. P. K. Sahi, learned Senior Counsel representing the petitioner submits that in the changed facts and circumstances of the case whereunder now it is stated that routes have been finalized and formulated and a notification in this regard has already been issued, he may be permitted to withdraw this application with liberty to pursue his remedy if any available to him in accordance with law.

This application is, thus, disposed off with the liberty aforesaid. All the interlocutory applications are also disposed off

Patna High Court CWJC No.11971 of 2018(4) dt.28-01-2019 2/2 accordingly.

The apprehension of the learned counsel for the respondents or the intervenor that despite disposal of writ application specific order with regard to vacation of the status quo be passed is uncalled for and misplaced as with the disposal of the writ application all interim orders merges with the same. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) avin/-vedU