Patna High CourtCR. MISC./57892/2015bail granted

Md. Kalim v. The State Of Bihar

2016-01-22Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.57892 of 2015 Arising out of P.S. Case No. -35 Year- 2015 Thana -AURAI District- MUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Md. Kalim Son of Md. Shahabuddin, resident of Village- Maqsoodpur, P.s Aurai, Dist Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. S. Jamil Akhtar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Chandra Sahni(APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 22-01-2016 Heard Mr. S. Jamil Akhtar, learned counsel for the petitioner, counsel for the State and Mr. Rakesh Singh, counsel for the informant.

The petitioner is in custody in connection with Aurai P.S. Case No. 35 of 2015 for offence punishable under Sections 365, 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the submissions of learned counsel that whereas the named accused in absence of corroborative evidence have been granted bail by this Court vide order passed on 05.11.2015 in Criminal Misc. No. 31628 of 2015 and Criminal Misc. No. 32765 of 2015 placed at Annexure-2, the petitioner is not even named and his involvement is on the basis of confession, let the petitioner

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57892 of 2015 (2) dt.22-01-2016 Md. Kalim be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur in connection with Aurai P.S. Case No. 35 of 2015, Sessions Trial No. 426 of 2015 subject to the condition that he shall ensure his attendance before the trial court on each and every date fixed and upon failure of the petitioner to do so on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation to the satisfaction of the trial court, the trial court would be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and to take him into custody.

(Jyoti Saran, J) S.Sb/- U T