Sanjeev Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9231 of 2024 ====================================================== Sanjeev Kumar Son of Late Ramdeo Thakur, Resident of Mohalla- Shiv Shankar Path, P.S.- Mithanpur, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director, Higher Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Pay Fixation Cell, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 5.

THe B.R.A. Bihar University through the Vice-Chancellor, Muzaffarpur. 6.

The Registrar, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur. 7.

The Pay Fixation Cell Department, B.R.A. University, Muzaffarpur. 8.

The Principal, M.D.D.M. College, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vijay Anand For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Standing Counsel (22) Mr Sriram Krishna , (B.R.A.U) Mr. Prabhart Kumar, Advocate Mr. Shashank Shekar Kumar, Adv ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 18-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the University.

2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner's case is squarely covered by judgment dated 13.11.2024 passed in C.W.J.C. No.16104 of 2024.

3. In view of the aforesaid, the impugned pay verification certificate issued vide Receipt No. 0308220600187 ,

Patna High Court CWJC No.9231 of 2024(4) dt.18-01-2025 2/2 under the signature of the authorized officer, Pay Verification Cell, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna (Annexure-P/10) is hereby quashed and the matter is remanded back to the State authorities for proceeding afresh in accordance with law.

4. It goes without saying that the petitioner is entitled to receive pay as earlier.

5. Accordingly, this writ application stands disposed of.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U