← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/12705/2018dfd for non appearance

Sheojee Prasad v. The Union Of India And ORS

2021-07-16Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12705 of 2018 ====================================================== Sheojee Prasad Son of Late Jangali Thakur resident of Co-operative Colony, Godhna Road No. 3, Anaith, P.S. Nawada, District - Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union Of India and Ors 2.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Cooperation, Bihar, Vikas Bhawan 3.

The Employees Provident Fund Organisation Ministry of Labour and Employment through its Managing D 4.

The Employees Provident Fund Organisation Ministry of Labour and Employment, Regional Office, Patn 5.

The Bihar State Co-operative Federation Ltd. through its Executive Officer, Budh Marg, Patna.

6.

The Central Co-operative Bank Ltd., Ara, P.O. Ara, District - Bhojpur through its Managing Director ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ram Krishna Singh :

Mr.Raghunath Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Raj Ballabh Pd. Yadav (AAG 11) :

Mr.Ranjeet Choubey :

Mr.R.S. Pradhan :

Mr.S.D. Sanjay (Addl. Soc. Gen.) :

Mr.Bindhyachal Rai :

Mr.Arvind Kumar Tewary (CGC) :

Mr.Ranjit Sinha :

Mr.Deo Narayan Prasad :

Mr.Manish Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-07-2021 This matter has been taken up for hearing online because of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions.

From the previous orders passed in the present case, it transpires that learned counsel for the petitioner has not appeared before this Court on several occasions.

Patna High Court CWJC No. 12705 of 2018(11) dt.16-07-2021 2/2 Mr. S. D. Yadav, learned AAG-9 appearing for the State of Bihar and learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 and 4 (Employees Provident Fund Organisation) are present. This application is accordingly dismissed for default, as it appears that the petitioner has lost interest in this matter in the light of specific stand taken on behalf of the Employees Provident Fund Organisation in its counter affidavit. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) AKASH/- U