Vicky Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 54866 of 2015 Arising out of P.S. Case No. - 214 Year - 2015 Thana - GAYA KOTWALI District - GAYA ====================================================== Ranjan Yadav, son of Rajendra Yadav, Resident of Bangla Asthan, New godown, P.S. - Kotwali, Dist - Gaya .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== With Criminal Miscellaneous No. 422 of 2016 Arising out of P.S. Case No. - 214 Year - 2015 Thana - GAYA KOTWALI District - GAYA ====================================================== Vicky Yadav, S/o Late Krishna Yadav, Resident of Bangla Asthan, Maharani Road, P.S. - Kotwali Town & District - Gaya .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
(In Cr.Misc. No. 54866 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.
(In Cr.Misc. No. 422 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD ORAL ORDER 08-03-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
These petitions are for grant of regular bail in a case under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 302, 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
There is specific allegation of assault against petitioner Ranjan Yadav. Allegation against the petitioner Vicky Yadav is general and omnibus.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54866 of 2015 (3) dt.08-03-2016 Hence, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, namely, Vicky Yadav in Cr. Misc. No. 422 of 2016 is ordered to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 214 of 2015, subject to the condition that the petitioner of Cr. Misc. No. 422 of 2016 shall appear in the case on each and every date fixed by the court below and shall also present at the time of framing of the charge, failing which his bail bond shall stand cancelled.
However, with regard to the petitioner of Cr. Misc. No. 54866 of 2015 is concerned, I am not inclined to grant him bail at this stage.
Kundan (Gopal Prasad, J) U T