Farhan Khan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37802 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2026 Thana- AURANGABAD TOWN DistrictAurangabad ====================================================== Farhan Khan S/o Humayu Khan Resident of Village - Kuibar, P.S.- Imamganj, District - Gaya, At present Resident of Alinagar near Naaj Hall P.O. and P.S.- Nagar (Town), District - Aurangabad, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sheikh Arkan Ahmad, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 17-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Nagar (Town) P.S. Case No. 93 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the police had an information that three persons are standing below the bridge in dubious condition. They were apprehended and the petitioner is one amongst them.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the house of the co-accused, namely,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37802 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026 2/2 Md. Danish, was searched by the police, and from his house, arms were recovered. He further submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, rather, the recovery, if any, has been made from the house of Md. Danish and the petitioner is not concerned in any way with Danish. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 09.03.2026.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of one case.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Auragabad in connection with Nagar (Town) P.S. Case No. 93 of 2026.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T