Rogi Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36222 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-122 Year-2025 Thana- KARAHGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== Rogi Singh son of Murli Singh @ Murali singh Village /Muhalla- Bakasada, P.S.- Karagahar, District- Rohtas, State- Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Saroj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 15-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, from the house of the petitioner, altogether 154.82 litres of illicit liquor, one countrymade pistol with three live cartridges were recovered.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Further submission is that nothing incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has no concern with the recovered materials. Petitioner was not present at his house at the time of recovery.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36222 of 2025(5) dt.15-10-2025 2/2 The charge-sheet has already been submitted after completion of investigation. It is submitted that similarly situated co-accused Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Kushwaha has already been granted regular bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 24.09.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 68322 of 2025. Petitioner is not involved in the illegal business of illicit liquor. Petitioner has clean antecedent and there is no chance of his absconding or tampering with the evidence. Petitioner is in custody since 25.04.2025 and he undertakes to cooperate in the trial.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and period of custody, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned in connection with Karagahar P.S. Case No.122 of 2025.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) utkarsh/- U T