Aditya Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33758 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-610 Year-2019 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali ====================================================== ADITYA THAKUR, Son of Rajesh Kumar Thakur, Resident of Village - Sultanpur, P.S. - Desari, District - Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajballav Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-12-2020 The matter has been taken up through virtual Court proceeding.

Let the defects, if any, be removed within two weeks after start of the physical Court.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

The FIR of the occurrence of robbery is against three unknown persons. Petitioner is in custody since 10.01.2020. Investigation of the case is already complete against the petitioner.

Submission is that petitioner was never put on T.I. Parade during investigation of the case nor any incriminating

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33758 of 2020(2) dt.22-12-2020 2/2 article was recovered from possession of the petitioner. Considering the fact that there is no direct material against the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Mahua Police Station Case No. 610 of 2019, subject to the following conditions:- (a) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the learned court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (b) Both the bailors shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below.

(c) The petitioner shall not leave the country without permission of the learned trial court.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/- U T