Ranvijay Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36587 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2026 Thana- SAHAJITPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Ranvijay Singh Son of Late Tarkeshwar Singh R/o Village - Pipra, P.S.- Sahajitpur, District - Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gajendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 15-06-2026 Heard Mr.Gajendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Bhanu Pratap Singh, learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 06.04.2026 in connection with Sahajitpur P.S. Case No. 86 of 2026, F.I.R. dated 04.05.2026 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. Recovery is of 5.760 liters of foreign liquor.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been made accused in the present case merely on the basis of suspicion. It appears from the FIR as well as the seizure list that altogether 5.760 liters of foreign liquor was recovered from the Bush behind the house of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36587 of 2026(2) dt.15-06-2026 2/3 petitioner and local Chaukidar has disclosed the name of the petitioner and petitioner was not apprehended at the place of occurrence and the petitioner is in custody since 06.04.2026.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the recovery has been made near the house of the petitioner, apart from that, the petitioner carries three more cases other than the present one but he fairly submits that out of three cases, the petitioner is on bail in the two cases, and rest one case is pending for consideration before the competent court of law, as mentioned in para-3 of the bail petition.

6. Considering the aforesaid fact, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2nd Exclusive Special Excise Judge, Saran at Chapra in connection with Sahajitpur P.S. Case No. 86 of 2026, with the following conditions:- (I) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36587 of 2026(2) dt.15-06-2026 3/3 (II) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(III) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T