Kaju Singh @ Aman Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37148 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-357 Year-2024 Thana- TEGHRHA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Kaju Singh @ Aman Kumar son of Shiv Prakash Singh @ shiv Kumar Ray @ Sheo Kumar singh R/o - Daniyalpur Ward No.04, P.S - Teghara, District - Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Anil Kumar Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Satyendra Narayan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 357 of 2024 dated 24.10.2024 registered for the offence/s punishable u/ss 126(2), 109, 352, 351(2) read with section 3(5) of the BNS and section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons each armed with pistols are alleged to have entered the house of the informant and started abusing and threatening to shoot. When the informant came out of his house, the other co-accused persons caught hold of him and the petitioner fired on him but the informant narrowly escaped and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37148 of 2025(2) dt.02-07-2025 2/3 they fled away by opening fire, thereafter police came and recovered five empty cartridges and two small parts of the bullet from the place of occurrence.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The specific allegation of firing is against the petitioner but no one sustained fire arm injury. The petitioner has four criminal antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail petition of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Begusarai in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 357 of 2024, subject to conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of the BNSS, with further condition/s:- (i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37148 of 2025(2) dt.02-07-2025 3/3 present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T