Md. Tanveer Sah @ Md. Tanweer Shah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38627 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-151 Year-2025 Thana- SAKRI District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

Md. Tanveer Sah @ Md. Tanweer Shah S/o- Late Md. Nayeem Shah Resident of Village- Birsar, P.S.- Sakri, District- Madhubani. 2.

Rehana Khatoon Wife of Lakhan Shah Resident of Village- Birsar, P.S.- Sakri, District- Madhubani.

3.

Md. Sarfaraz @ Sarfaraz Shah Son of Md. Tauhid Shah Resident of VillageBirsar, P.S.- Sakri, District- Madhubani. 4.

Kaseeda Khatoon @ Ginni Khatoon @ Ghunni Khatoon Wife of Md. Tahid Shah @ Tauhid Shah Resident of Village- Birsar, P.S.- Sakri, DistrictMadhubani. 5.

Umera Khatoon @ Umri Khatoon Wife of Arif Shah Resident of VillageBirsar, P.S.- Sakri, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav, Advocate Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 17-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Sakri P.S. Case No. 151 of 2025 instituted under Sections 80, 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per the prosecution case, the deceased was killed by the accused persons for demand of dowry.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38627 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026 2/3 this case. Co-accused Md. Nehal Sah is the husband of the deceased, and the petitioner no. 1 is the brother; petitioner no. 2 is the Bhabhi(sister-in-law); petitioner no. 3 is the son of the cousin brother; petitioner no. 4 is cousin Bhabhi and petitioner no. 5 is the sister of the aforsaid co-accused Md. Nehal Sah.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that there is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners and the petitioners are not involved in the crime.

7. Considering the relationship of the present petitioners and the fact that there is general and omnibus allegation against them, this application is allowed.

8. Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioners, above named, be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani/ concerned Court below in connection with Sakri P.S. Case No. 151 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482 of the BNSS/ 438(2) of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38627 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026 3/3 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

9. It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioners at any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not express any opinion on the merits of the case.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T