Manish Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47197 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-31 Year-2019 Thana- LAXMIPUR District- Jamui ====================================================== Manish Kumar Singh Son Of Rajeev Ranjan Singh Resident Of Village - Athamaha, P.O.- Ranikutta, P.S.- Amarpur, Distt.- Banka. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manisha Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Akhileshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 27-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 419 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner. He submits that articles on demand were supplied to the member of the Managing Committee and the money in lieu of the articles so supplied was transferred to the supplier/shop owner through R.T.G.S. in the account no. 10170000041244. In this regard the shop owner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47197 of 2021(4) dt.27-07-2022 2/2 supplied articles worth Rs. 6,36,326/- but was paid only Rs. 6,07,500/- by the Committee Member. He submits that the allegation in the FIR that the cheque has been issued in the name of the petitioner is false rather the amount has been transferred to the petitioner through R.T.G.S. for the cost of the goods/articles supplied to the committee.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner, the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Laxmipur P.S. Case No. 31 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T