Pramod Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9925 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -154 Year- 2015 Thana -PAHARPUR DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Pramod Singh, Son of Dhruv Narayan Singh, resident of village - Goverdhanpur, Police Station - Paharpur, District - East Champaran at Motihari .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Shanker Pankaj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. P.K.Pandey (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER 17-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State as also learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

Petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Paharpur P.S. Case No. 154/15 for offences alleged under Sections 447, 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 379, 504 of the Indian Penal Code, but later on Section 302 I.P.C. was added.

The prosecution case, as lodged by the informant, is that there was a fight between the petitioner side and the informant side in which both sides received injuries and the petitioner side also lodged First Information Report bearing Paharpur P.S. Case No. 155/15 for similar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9925 of 2016 (3) dt.17-05-2016 2/3 offences.

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is innocent having no criminal antecedent and one co-accused Binod Singh, who is alleged to have caused injury on one person of informant's side, who sustained injury and succumbed after 27 days and has been opined by the doctor to have died due to chronic illness, has since been granted the privilege of bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 16481 of 2016 on 26.04.2016. He further submits that the injury alleged to have caused on the informant by the petitioner has been found to be simple in nature as per injury report. However, learned APP for the informant as well as learned APP for the State submit that the petitioner is named in the First Information Report having caused injury on the informant, hence, oppose the prayer for bail.

Be that as it may, let petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9925 of 2016 (3) dt.17-05-2016 3/3 Champaran at Motihari, in connection with Paharpur P.S. Case No. 154/15, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(Nilu Agrawal, J.) Rajesh/- U T