Jagdip Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34341 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-201 Year-2019 Thana- GANGABRIDGE District- Vaishali ====================================================== JAGDIP RAI Son of Late Ram Kripal Rai and in the F.I.R. father name is wrongly mentioned as Kuldeep Rai Resident of Village- Saifpur, P.S.- Ganga Bridge, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Tej Kumar Maharaj For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Awadhesh Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-03-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the Office, within a period of four weeks.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case, in short, is that the accused persons came to the door of the informant and fired at her dever due to which he received injuries and later succumbed to the injuries..

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34341 of 2020(2) dt.17-03-2021 2/2 present case. There is a case and counter case between the parties. The allegation of assault is alleged against Amod Rai, Manoj Rai, Mithilesh Rai and Jitendra Rai. As far as petitioner is concerned, he is said to be member of unlawful assembly. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest his implication in the present case. Other co-accused has been granted bail vide Annexure-5 to the present application. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. -1st, Hajipur, Vaishali in connection with Ganga Bridge P.S. Case No. 201/2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T