Chhatish Rai @ Satish Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35099 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-253 Year-2018 Thana- MAHNAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== CHHATISH RAI @ SATISH RAI Son of Shankar Rai Resident of VillageNarainpur, Dedhpura, P.S. Mahnar, District- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pranav Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Tapeshwar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 09-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Mahnar P.S. Case No. 253 of 2018, instituted for the offence under Section(s) 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Vaishali at Hajipur. It is alleged in the written report that on the date of occurrence, petitioner assaulted the son of informant in abdomen with leg, on account of which, he became unconscious. He was brought to Hospital for treatment, but he died during course of treatment.

Case diary has been received.

The post mortem report is available in the case diary wherein Doctor has found tear in mesentric and mesocolon

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35099 of 2019(4) dt.09-08-2019 2/2 with blood and blood clot in peritoneal cavity. The Doctor has opined the cause of death due to haemorrhage and shock on account of injury to major blood vessel resulting from impact of hard and blunt substance over Anterior abdominal wall. As such, there is specific allegation against the petitioner.

Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

Prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and make efforts to conclude the same as early as possible preferably within a period of nine months from the date of receipt of this order. The petitioner is given liberty to renew his prayer for bail in the event the trial is not concluded within aforesaid period.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T