Jay Mangal Mahto v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39475 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-294 Year-2019 Thana- GARKHA District- Saran ====================================================== 1.
Jay Mangal Mahto Son Of Ram Chandra Mahto Resident Of Village - Bhuigaon, P.S. - Garkha, Distt. - Saran At Chapra 2.
Ram Chandra Mahto Son Of Marai Mahto Resident Of Village - Bhuigaon, P.S. - Garkha, Distt. - Saran At Chapra 3.
Gunja Kumari D/O Bikarma Mahto Resident Of Village - Bhuigaon, P.S. - Garkha, Distt. - Saran At Chapra 4.
Rinku Kumari D/O Bikarma Mahto Resident Of Village - Bhuigaon, P.S. - Garkha, Distt. - Saran At Chapra 5.
Raj Kumari Devi Wife Of Bikarma Mahto Resident Of Village - Bhuigaon, P.S. - Garkha, Distt. - Saran At Chapra 6.
Sunaina Devi Wife Of Jay Mangal Mahto Resident Of Village - Bhuigaon, P.S. - Garkha, Distt. - Saran At Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vijay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Uday Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 08-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Allegation against the petitioners is that they along with other co-accused persons assaulted the informant's side by means of various weapons.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39475 of 2023(2) dt.08-08-2023 2/2 case. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is no specific overt act against the petitioner. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties, both sides have sustained injury and the injury was found simple in nature. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No.294 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T