Mrinal Kishore Priyadarshi @ Gopal Pandey v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.8450 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -30313 Year- 2014 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPATNA ====================================================== Mrinal Kishore Priyadarshi @ Gopal Pandey S/o Janardan Pandey resident of Mohalla - Pathari Ghat, Tripolia, P.S. Alamganj, District - Patna .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Madhu Kumari @ Madhu Pathak D/o Rajeshwar Pathak @ Rajesh Pathak resident of Jawahar Nagar, D.S.P. Road, Gumla, P.S. Gumla, District - Gumla ( Jharkhand ) .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhaskar Shankar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Harendra Pd.(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-04-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Petitioner apprehends his arrest in complaint case no. 30313(c) of 2014, instituted under 420, 467, 471 of Indian Penal Code.
The complainant, who is the wife of the petitioner, alleged that her husband had earlier taken blank signatures on five different pages from her, which he misused for filing divorce case with consent. She next submits that the compromise petition has been filed by fraudulently using her blank signatures. If the allegations are true, the matter would be of serious nature. The complaint is pending consideration before J.M. 1st
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8450 of 2016 (2) dt.11-04-2016 2/2 class, in seisin of the case.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest/surrender, let the petitioner named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Anil Kumar Ram, J.M. 1st Class, Patna or the court in seisin of the case, in connection with Complaint Case No. 30313(c) of 2014, with the condition that he would not physically absent for two consecutive dates at a stretch, till one witness is examined in the case and would also not tamper with the evidence of the case, failing which his bail bond would be cancelled.
(Samarendra Pratap Singh, J) kunal/- U T