Pankaj Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35428 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2025 Thana- CHAPRA TOWN District- Saran ====================================================== Pankaj Kumar Singh S/O Kedar Nath Singh @ Kedar Singh R/O VillageRauja Nayee Basti, P.S- Chapra Town, Distt.- Saran at Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Chandra Mohan Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Navin Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 11-06-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Chapra Town P.S Case no.39 of 2025 registered under sections 307 and 313 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that on secret information having been received about the accused persons having gathered and planning to give effect to an occurrence, a raid was conducted. Various articles were recovered from other accused persons. It is stated that an iron rod was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. On being questioned, it is stated that the accused persons confessed that they act as gang and give effect to occurrences of robbery and theft.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35428 of 2025(2) dt.11-06-2025 2/2 petitioner who has no criminal antecedent has been falsely implicated in the case. No incriminating article has been recovered from his possession. He is in custody since 5.2.2025 and chargesheet has been submitted in the case. Learned counsel submits that the only material that has transpired in course of investigation, as would be evident from the order of the learned trial Court, is the statement of co-accused made before police.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations in the FIR, the material that has transpired in course of investigation as would be evident from the order of the learned trial Court, the petitioner having remained in custody since 5.2.2025, not having any criminal antecedent and chargesheet having been submitted in the case, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Chapra Town P.S Case no.39 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra. (Partha Sarthy, J) Shiv/- U T