Sanjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.8861 of 2016 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -131 Year- 2015 Thana -PATLIPUTRA District- PATNA ====================================================== Sanjay Kumar, Son of Sri Ram Lakhan Prasad, Resident of Village + Police Station - Kanhauli, District - Sitamarhi, At present residing at Judges' Colony, RPS Morh, Baili Road, Police Station - Rupaspur, District - Patna.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Shanker Pankaj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Chandra Sahni (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-04-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Additional Public Prosecutor.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case under Sections 448, 420, 384, 380 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is the Chairman of an NGO, known as Samadhan Sewa Sadan. The informant is the Secretary of the said NGO. He alleged that in his absence, petitioner shifted the office and has also taken under his control the entire properties. The petitioner submits that the instant case is a counter blast to the earlier case filed by him, against the informant. It appears that there is some business dispute between the parties.
In the circumstances, in the event of arrest or
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8861 of 2016 (3) dt.22-04-2016 2/2 surrender before the court below within four weeks from today the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Patliputra P.S. case no. 131 of 2015 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., with the further condition that he would deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) before the court below, which would be subject to the result of the case. The petitioner would not physically absent for two consecutive dates in the case, till charges are framed. (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.) Uday/- U T