Bodhu Paswan @ Surendra Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.56238 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -223 Year- 2015 Thana -KHIJARSARAI District- GAYA ====================================================== Bodhu Paswan @ Surendra Paswan, son of Late Lakhan Paswan, resident of Village- Shyamnagar, P.S.- Khijarsarai, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. L.K.Sharma(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 15-12-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Petitioner is accused in connection with Khijarsarai P.S. Case No. 223 of 2015 registered under Section 395/397 of the I.P.C.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that it would appear from the F.I.R. that on the basis of the fardbeyan of informant Arbind Ram, Khijarsarai P.S. Case No. 223 of 2015 was instituted under sections 395 and 397 of the I.P.C. regarding snatching cash of Rs. 6000/- from the pocket of the informant's driver of the truck. In course of investigation, the Police apprehended the petitioner mere on suspicion and got recorded the confessional statement showing his involvement.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56238 of 2015 (2) dt.15-12-2015 2/2 Except that, there is nothing against the petitioner. It is also submitted that while the informant has claimed to identify the culprit, but petitioner, who is in custody since 13.08.2015, has not been put on Test Identification Parade for identification. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Gaya in connection with Khijarsarai P.S. Case No. 223 of 2015. Out of two sureties, one surety must be parents or close relatives of the petitioner.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.) Shail/- U T