Chandan Puri v. The State Of Bihar Through Cabinet Vigilance Department
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.879 of 2017 ====================================================== Chandan Puri, Son of Arun Kumar Puri, Resident of MohallaHospital Road, P.O + P.S.-Town Thana, Motihari, DistrictMotihari (East Champarn) .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar through Cabinet Vigilance Department .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.885 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -null Year- null Thana -null District- PATNA ====================================================== Pawan Kumar Yadav, Son of Rajendra Yadav, Resident of Village-Jaynagar, Ward No.-8, P.S.-Jainagar, DistrictMadhubani .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar through Vigilance, Bihar, Patna .... .... Opposite Party ============================================== Appearance:
(In Cr.Misc. No.879 of 2017) For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashish Giri, Advocate Mr. Pranav Kumar, Advocate For the Vigilance : Mr. Rama Kant Sharma(L.O,I/C Vigi) (In Cr.Misc. No.885 of 2017) For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kr. Thakur, Advocate Ms. Babita Kumari, Advocate Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocate For the Vigilance : Mr. Rama Kant Sharma , (L.O,I/C Vigi) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 31-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.879 of 2017 (4) dt.31-01-2017 2/3 State.
The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 7/8/13(2) read with Section 13(1)(D) of P.C. Act.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that other co-accused Gulam Mustafa Ansari with similar allegation has already been granted bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 1764 of 2017 dated 19.01.2017. It has further been submitted that from perusal of the running page51 Post Trap Memorandum (internal page-36), it will be apparent that there is no specific allegation against these petitioners of taking the amount of bribe. It is mentioned in the memorandum itself that informant told that money has been given to the bodyguard and bodyguard has given the money to these petitioners. The S.D.O. with similar allegation as mentioned has already been granted bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court as mentioned above. These petitioners are in custody since 28.10.2016.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.879 of 2017 (4) dt.31-01-2017 3/3 Special Judge, Vigilance, North Bihar, Muzafarpur, in connection with Special Case No. 52 of 2016 arising out of Vigilance P.S. Case No. 116 of 2016, subject to the condition that both the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioners. (Sanjay Priya, J.) ravi/- U T