← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2366/2018withdrawn

Manoranjan Prasad Srivastava v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2023-04-20Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar,Mr. Justice Harish Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2366 of 2018 In Letters Patent Appeal No.716 of 2017 ====================================================== Manoranjan Prasad Srivastava, Son of Late Bir Prasad Srivastava, resident of Kasinath Lane, East Lohanipur, near Hanuman Mandir, P.S. P.O.- Kadamkuan, Patna- 3.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar.

2.

Mr. Deepak Kumar, the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Director, Directorate of Consumer Protection, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4.

Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Secretary, Directorate of Consumer Protection Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

5.

Mr. Chadrashekhar, Additional Secretary, Directorate of Consumer Protection Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

6.

Mr. Bharat Dubey, Special Secretary, Directorate of Consumer Protection Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

7.

Mr. Dilip Kumar, the Director-cum Joint Commissioner, PROVIDENT Fund Directorate, Finance Departmen 8.

Smt. Sujata Chaturvedi, the Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

9.

Mr. Rahul Singh, the Secretary, Expenditure, Finance Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

10.

Mr. Madan Mohan Prasad, Director, Investigation, Section 3 A, Finance Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rohitabh Das, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR) 20-04-2023 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner on repeated calls to press this petition.

Mr. Rohitabh Das, learned advocate for the

Patna High Court MJC No.2366 of 2018(9) dt.20-04-2023 2/2 State, has intimated this Court that most of the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. In that view of the matter, we dismiss this contempt petition.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J) ( Harish Kumar, J) rohit/- U