Paras Nath Choubey @ Paras Nath Chaturvedi v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28740 of 2014 (3) dt.15-01-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.28740 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -227 Year- 2013 Thana -MOHANIA District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ======================================================
1. Paras Nath Choubey @ Paras Nath Chaturvedi Son of Late Ram Vyas Choubey @ Vyas Choubey resident of village+P.O.- Muzan, P.S.- Mohania, District- Kaimur.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gopal Swaroop Dubey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar-Iii(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 15-01-2015 Heard learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Mohania P.S. Case No. 227 of 2013 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Allegation is that due to indiscriminate assault by the petitioner and others injuries were caused to the victim and the petitioner has inflicted injury with Garansa on the head of the informant.
Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been implicated due to land dispute, he was
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28740 of 2014 (3) dt.15-01-2015 not present in the village at the time of occurrence as he was in the school being a government teacher and for that the headmaster has also issued a certificate and the attendance register of the school shows that the petitioner was present in the school at the relevant time to which the learned counsel for the informant opposes by submitting that in this case prayer of regular bail of the co-accused has already been rejected and the petitioner is the prime accused. In the facts and circumstances stated above, this Court is not persuaded to grant the privilege of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner, accordingly, his such prayer stands rejected. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T