← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/211/2016withdrawn

Sushila Devi v. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna And ORS.

2016-02-25Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.211 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Sushila Devi, Wife of Om Prakash Choudhary, Resident of Railway Halts Road, Opp. Sita Lodge, East Lohanipur, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary (Home), Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

4. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna.

5. S.H.O., Kadamkuan.

6. Manish Kumar, Son of Om Prakash Choudhary, Resident of Railway Halts Road, Opp. Sita Lodge, East Lohanipur, District- Patna. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nagendra Kr. Singh, Adv. Mr. Binay Kumar Singh, Adv.

Mr. Dhananjay Kr. Pandey, Adv.

For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anil Kr. Tiwary, AC To AAG-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) 25-02-2016 Heard Mr. Nagendra Kumar Singh, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Mr. Anil Kumar Tiwary, learned Assistant Counsel to Additional Advocate General No.13, appearing on behalf of the Staterespondents. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and also to take recourse to such provisions

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.211 of 2016 (2) dt.25-02-2016 2/2 of law as may be permissible.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and also to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) K.C.jha/- U T