Niraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9798 of 2025 ====================================================== 1.

Niraj Kumar Son of Tapeshwar Yadav, Resident of Mohalla- Adarsh Nagar, Ward No. 8, P.S.- Madhepura, District- Madhepura. 2.

Pravin Kumar Prabhakar, Son of Raj Kumar Mandal, Resident of VillageChampa Nagar, P.S.- Singheshwar District- Madhepura. 3.

Nilam Kumari, Wife of Dineshwar Prasad, Resident of Village- Kabiyahi, P.S.- Shankarpur, District- Madhepura.

4.

Bidyanand Swarnkar, Son of Sibnandan Swarnkar, Resident of VillageSurya Garh, P.S. Gamhariya, District- Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Human Resources, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The District Education Officer, Madhepura.

4.

The District Programme Officer, Establishment Madhepura, DistrictMadhepura. 5.

The Block Education Extension Officer, Shankarpur, Madhepura. 6.

The Chairman, Sri Gorelal added Middle School Kabiyahi, Shankarpur, Madhepura.

7.

The Secretary cum Incharge Headmaster, Managing Committee, Middle School Kabiyahi, Shankarpur, Madhepura.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kumar Vishoka Nand, Adv For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Standing Counsel (6) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 31-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State.

2. After advancing some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on account of certain developments that have taken place during the pendency of the present writ application, for the moment, this writ application

Patna High Court CWJC No.9798 of 2025(3) dt.31-03-2026 2/2 has become infructuous, and therefore, he seeks to withdraw the writ application with liberty to file a fresh writ application for the new cause of action that has arisen during the pendency of the writ application.

3. As prayed for, this writ application is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.

(Alok Kumar Sinha, J) kiran/- U