Santu Singh @ Ritesh Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37966 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-289 Year-2019 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada ====================================================== SANTU SINGH @ RITESH RANJAN SON OF ARVIND SINGH R/O VILLAGE- ANTI, P.S.- KADIRGANJ, DISTRICT- NAWADA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Singh, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Raj Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Sarvottam Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kanhaiya Kishore (App 100) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 28-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects within four weeks.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for offence punishable u/s 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 379, 384 of the IPC.

Allegedly, the petitioner along with other co-accused came at the showroom of the informant and damaged vehicles and taken away money from the counter. They also demanded Rs. 2,00,000/- as a Rangdari and threatened to kill him.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to malacious motive. No

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37966 of 2022(2) dt.28-11-2022 2/2 such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner as such there is no specific overt act against the petitioner. It is further submitted that petitioner has given loan of Rs. 5,00,000/- to the informant. But when petitioner asked to informant for returning the amount, then some hot talked exchanged between them and he threatened to implicate him in false case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Nawada Town P.S. Case No.289 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T