← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./34526/2019bail granted

Upendra Kumar Yadav @ Upendra Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2019-05-28Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34526 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-167 Year-2017 Thana- RIVILGANJ District- Saran ====================================================== Upendra Kumar Yadav @ Upendra Rai, aged about 29 years, Male, Son of Ram Jatan Rai, Resident of Village Rivilganj Thakurbari, P.S. Rivilganj, District Saran (Chapra).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Brij Kishor Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Abhay Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 28-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The instant application has been filed by the petitionerbrother-in-law(Devar) of the deceased, who apprehends his arrest in connection with Rivilganj P.S. Case No. 167 of 2017, registered for offence punishable under Sections 304B/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioner is that the marriage of the daughter of the informant was solemnized in the year 2012 and the petitioner along with other relatives used to torture the deceased due to non fulfillment of demand of dowry. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner, who happens to be Devar of the deceased and he was working in Steel Plant, Durgapur and as such the delay in moving to file. It is stated that the investigation has been concluded and charge sheet has been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34526 of 2019(2) dt.28-05-2019 2/2 filed under Section 306/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that there is allegation of demand of dowry against all the accused persons including the petitioner herein and the deceased died within seven years of marriage. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as also the facts that a number of similarly situated co-accused persons namely, Ramjatan Rai, Panna Devi, Mahabir Rai and Saraswati Devi have all been enlarged on anticipatory bail by order dated 23.11.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 53734 of 2017 let the petitioner, Upendra Kumar Yadav @ Upendra Rai, in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Rivilganj P.S. Case No.

167 of 2017, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-8, Chapra, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C.

(Partha Sarthy, J) sudha/Gautam U T