Muna Singh @ Jailendar Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40047 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-153 Year-2023 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== Muna Singh @ Jailendar Kumar, Son of Late Ram Prasad Singh Resident of village - Sonadih, P.S. - Kargahar, Distt. - Rohtas, Present address - Takia Yadav Mohalla, P.S. - Sasaram (T), Distt. - Rohtas at Sasaram ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Jai Prakash Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Navin Kumar Pandey, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-07-2023 Heard Mr. Jai Prakash Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Sasaram (T) P.S. Case No. 153 of 2023, registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 354(B), 379, 448, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that accused persons named in the F.I.R. variously armed with Lathi, Danda and country made pistol entered into the house of the informant and snatched Rs. 20,000/- and Mangal Sutra worth of Rs. 30,000/-. The allegation against the petitioner is that he had
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40047 of 2023(2) dt.28-07-2023 2/3 also molested the informant.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner is a clerk in civil Court and he has falsely been implicated in this case due to the fact that he has not done the work of informant. He further submitted that petitioner is get rid of false allegation, he is ready to compensate the monetary loss caused by him and in this regard, learned counsel submitted that he has received instruction from the petitioner that he is ready to pay Rs.20,000/- to the informant.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the nature of allegation made in the F.I.R. as well as the fact that the informant sustained injury, but the opinion is reserved with respect to the nature of injury. Let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram Rohtas in connection with Sasaram (T) P.S. Case No. 153 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40047 of 2023(2) dt.28-07-2023 3/3
7. Any observation made in the present bail application will not prejudice the trial of the petitioner in any manner.
(Purnendu Singh, J) manish/- U T