← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./34763/2020bail granted

Hulchul Kamkar @ Santosh Kamkar @ Santosh Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2021-01-20Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34763 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-153 Year-2020 Thana- SIMRI District- Buxar ====================================================== HULCHUL KAMKAR @ SANTOSH KAMKAR @ SANTOSH PRASAD, aged about 32 years, Male, Son of Kailsah Kamkar, Resident of VillageBalihar, P.S.- Simri, Distt- Buxar. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Shankar Kumar, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Nityanand Tiwari, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-01-2021 Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offence registered under Sections 20(b)(ii)(c), 22, 25, 27(A) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The prosecution story, in brief, is that on 29.05.2020 at about 11.00 O'clock, on receiving secret information, the informant and others apprehended the petitioner and recovered total 7.740 kgs., Ganja from possession of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34763 of 2020(2) dt.20-01-2021 2/2 It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 30.05.2020. Charge sheet has been submitted in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Total 7.740 kgs., Ganja is said to have been recovered from possession of the petitioner. The same is below the commercial quantity. Hence, Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act is not applicable in the present case. There is no compliance of Sections 42 and 50 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Court, N.D.P.S. Act, Buxar, in connection with N.D.P.S. Case No. 11of 2020, arising out of Simri P.S. Case No. 153 of 2020. (Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T