Ranjana Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

Patna High Court MJC No.2526 of 2014 dt.16-02-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2526 of 2014 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7607 of 2008 =========================================================== Ranaja Kumari, wife of Rajiv Ranjan, Resident of Mohalla- Bagmali, P.S. Hajipur, District Vaishali at present working as Assistant Teacher, Town Middle School Hajipur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Sri M. Sharwan, The District Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.

3. Shashi Bhushan, The District Education Officer Vaishali at Hajipur. .... .... Opposite Party/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Jain For the Respondent/s : Mr. Nasim Yahya =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 16-02-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.C. to G.P. 13.

The present contempt application has been filed for noncompliance of the order dated 29.10.2010 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 7607 of 2008 whereunder the aforesaid writ application was disposed of with a direction to the District Superintendent of Education, Vaishali at Hajipur to consider representation of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

Learned A.C. to G.P. 13 submits that in compliance of the order under contempt, the representation of the petitioner has

Patna High Court MJC No.2526 of 2014 dt.16-02-2015 been disposed of by the District Education Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur (opposite party no. 3) refusing the claim of the arrears of salary to the petitioner vide order dated 28.01.2015 and also communicated the same to the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that representation of the petitioner regarding payment of arrears of the salary to the petitioner has not been decided by the opposite party no. 3 in accordance with law.

Since the order, under contempt, has already been complied with by the opposite party no. 3, therefore, no further action is required. If the petitioner feels any grievance, he may take recourse in accordance with law before the appropriate forum. Accordingly, this contempt application is disposed of.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U