← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./37801/2022bail rejected

Dinesh Ray @ Suresh Ray v. The State Of Bihar

2022-10-18Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37801 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-215 Year-2021 Thana- TARARI District- Bhojpur ============================================ ========== DINESH RAY @ SURESH RAY Son of Late Ram Kishun Ray Resident of village- Kush Mahi, P.S.- Tarari, DistrictBhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ============================================ ========== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Surendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s:

Mr.Narendra Kumar Singh ============================================ ========== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-10- Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under section 302 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37801 of 2022(2) dt.18-10-2022 2/3 Act.

As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the other co-accused persons holding lathi, danda, bricks and stones started assaulting the informant's husband. During that assault the co-accused Pankaj Kumar holding pistol also threatened to kill. In the meantime the co-accused Bachano Kumari came with a rifle and gave it to the petitioner and the petitioner fired five shots on the informant's husband causing his death. Previously the petitioner and the co-accused persons had also assaulted the informant's husband.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case on mere suspicion. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 23.11.2021. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner by submitting that there is specific allegation against the petitioner and as per the post mortem report, the doctor has opined that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37801 of 2022(2) dt.18-10-2022 3/3 deceased died on the spot due to gunshot injuries. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the specific and heinous nature of allegation against the petitioner. I am not inclined to enlarge this petitioner above-named on bail.

The bail petition stands rejected.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) niku/- U T