← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36099/2025bail granted

Sidharth Kumar @ Nikhil v. The State Of Bihar

2025-06-16Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36099 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2025 Thana- DANAPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Sidharth Kumar @ Nikhil Son of Shri Baldeo Prasad Resident of Mohalla - Dhebit Tola Ward No.- 02, P.S.- Danapur, District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arbind Kumar Choudhary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 16-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No. 95 of 2025 instituted for the offence under Sections 25(1-b)a & 26 of the Arms Act. 3.

Prosecution case in short is that there is recovery of one country made pistol from the possession of the petitioner. 4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 31-01-2025. Petitioner bears two criminal antecedents, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioner's counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36099 of 2025(2) dt.16-06-2025 2/2 case. It is submitted that petitioner has no concern with the recovered arms. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel next submits that police after investigation has already submitted charge sheet in this case. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the BNSS, 2023.

6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner and charge sheet being submitted, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No. 95 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T