Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9629/2016rejected

Jairam Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2016-04-13Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9629 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -351 Year- 2015 Thana -SAUR BAZAR District- SAHARSA ======================================================

1. Jairam Yadav, son of Late Bino Roy alias Bino Yadav.

2. Rambharosh Yadav, son of Late Bino Roy alias Bino Yadav. Both resident of village-Gadhiya, Police Station-Sour Bazar, DistrictSaharsa. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER ------------- 13-04-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Sour Bazar Police Station Case No. 351 of 2015 registered under Sections 341, 323, 307 and 386/34 of the Indian Penal Code besides Section 27 of the Arms Act, pending in the court of the Chief Judiical Magistrate, Saharsa.

The accusation is that four persons including the petitioners having firearms surrounded the vehicle of the informant and made demand of Rs.2,00,000/- as ransom from the informant. When the informant tried to flee away, all the accused persons started to make indiscriminate firing. In the meantime,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9629 of 2016 (2) dt.13-04-2016 2/2 police also reached there and apprehended the co-accused Sintu Yadav while others succeeded to flee away.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, in fact, the informant himself is a veteran criminal and is involved in several cases but due to ulterior motive, he has falsely implicated the petitioners and others in this case.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioners, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U T