Ranjit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40833 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-485 Year-2023 Thana- CHANDI District- Nalanda ====================================================== Ranjit Kumar Son Of Alakhdeo Prasad Village -Araut, Police Station -Chandi, District -Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ajay Mukherjee For the State :
Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh For the Informant :
Mr. Deepak Kumar, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 03-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Chandi (Wena) P.S. Case No. 485 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, the allegation against the petitioner is that he fired upon one Chunchun Kumar.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40833 of 2024(2) dt.03-07-2024 2/2 specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties. He further submits that both the parties are co-villager and the occurrence had taken place due to previous enmity. Petitioner has one criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
5. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail and submitted that the petitioner is said to have fired upon one Chunchun Kumar and the injury was found grievous in nature.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of case and the nature of the injury, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T