Sonu @ Sonu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39333 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-78 Year-2021 Thana- BARHIYA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== SONU @ SONU KUMAR Son of Rajju Mira @ Raj Kumar Jha R/O VillageMisharwa Tola near to Kali Asthan, P.S.- Barahiya, District- lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rajesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Umesh lal Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 04-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 27 of the Arms Act. As per allegation in the FIR, while the informant and his friends were sitting at the door of his house, all accused persons came there and dragged his father out of the house and took away him by four wheeler. During course of search, they found dead body of his father thrown near railway campus. It is further alleged that 2-3 days prior to the alleged occurrence, accused persons threatened his father of dire consequences. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Informant
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39333 of 2022(3) dt.04-01-2023 2/2 is not an eye witness of the occurrence and due to previous enmity, a false case has been filed against his entire family. No specific allegation is attributed against him. He is languishing in judicial custody since 27.04.2022. Similary situated other coaccused persons, who is father of the present petitioner has already been granted regular bail by another co-ordinate Bench vide order dated 20.06.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 43827 of 2021.
The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Lakhisarai in connection with Barahiya P.S. Case No. 78 of 2021.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U