Chandradeep Mandal v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.9981 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -179 Year- 2015 Thana -MANIHARI District- KATIHAR ====================================================== Chandradeep Mandal, Son of Late Sitaram Mandal, Resident of village - Margaha, Police Station - Manihari, District - Katihar. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Sah For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Singh Shastri, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-06-2016 Heard the parties.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Manihari P.S. Case No.179 of 2015 for offence punishable under Sections-302 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section-27 of the Arms Act.
The informant who is the son of the deceased states that his father has enmity with one Dhanpal Mandal, who hatched the entire conspiracy. It is alleged that Dhanpal Mandal, in conspiracy with Sakaldeep Mandal and Chandradeep Mandal, got his father killed.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no material in the case diary except suspicion that the petitioner was involved in killing his father. He further submits that nothing has come in the case diary that the petitioner ever threatened the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9981 of 2016 (5) dt.09-06-2016 informant or his father or was ever seen stalking his father. On view of the above facts, let the petitionerChandradeep Mandal, in the event of his arrest/surrender, within four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand rupees) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,1st Class, Katihar in connection with Manihari P.S. Case No.179 of 2015, subject to the condition that the petitioner would not physically absent for two consecutive dates at a stretch till two witnesses are examined in trial.
(Samarendra Pratap Singh, J) deepika/- U T